Ano de Publicação: 2011

 

AUTORIA

Luciana Schultz, MD,* Carlos E. Maluf, MD,w Roge´rio C. da Silva, MD,w

Rodrigo de H. Falashi, MD,w Matheus V. da Costa, MD,*

and Maria Ines O. Schultz, MD*

 

RESUMO

In addition to clinical data, prostatic biopsy (Bx) reports

orient urologists in outlining the patient’s treatment options.

Discontinuous involvement of a core by multiple foci of

cancer is not infrequent; however, there is currently no consensus

as to which method of quantification should be the

standard. We applied 2 distinct approaches to quantify the

length of cancer foci in the Bx and compared the results to

prostatectomy (RP) parameters. All patients with matched Bx

and RP treated by the same medical team between 2006 and

2010 were consecutively included in the study. Tumor extent in

the Bx was estimated by multiple approaches, and the length

was measured in millimeters. The subset of cases with discontinuous

foci of cancer in a single core was initially reported

by adding each foci and ignoring the benign intervening prostatic

tissue, which was designated as additive quantification

(AQ). Upon slide review, these foci were reassessed as a single

focus and measured by linear quantification (LQ). RPs were

partially embedded according to the International Society of

Urological Pathology recommendations, and the percentage of

tumor was evaluated with graphic precision. Mean percentage of

the tumor in RP (%RP) and in the Bx were arbitrarily classified

as limited (<6%) and nonlimited (Z6%). Bx parameters were

then correlated with %RP and margin status. All methods of

quantification of the tumor in the Bx obtained excellent correlation

with %RP. LQ and AQ diverged in 14/38 patients, with a

mean total length of cancer of 5.8mm more than the length

obtained by LQ in the same population, accurately upgrading

6/14 cases to nonlimited. This subset (LQ>AQ) was more often

seen in Bx with significantly more positive cores (P=0.003) of

predominantly Gleason score 7 and associated with positive

surgical margins in RP (P=0.034) independent of %RP (21%

BAIXAR ARTIGO (PDF)